For quite a
while now, the enormous amounts of money at the top of the game is slowly
killing football as we know it. Smaller clubs in the lower leagues have
struggled to survive with a large amount of clubs entering administration more
than ever, in the past 5 years or so. The Premier League has become so uneven
in recent years in two ways.
The first is
that it is miles ahead of any other League in England, which didn’t use to be
the case before its inception in 1992. Clubs like Nottingham Forrest and Derby
in the 1970s had won England’s top Division almost immediately after being
promoted, suggesting a much more even playing field back in those days. The
same happened with Leeds just before the inception of the Premier League, who
were promoted to the top tier, Division One in 1990 and won in just two years
later.
The second
way is how teams such as Man City, Man Utd, Chelsea, Arsenal and to some extent
Liverpool have completely dominated the league in the past 15 years or so. It
is no coincidence considering they have been far and away the biggest spenders
in this time frame.
It is clear then that inadvertently the
creation of the Premier League and all the television revenue generated by clubs
since then, has made the beautiful game all about money. Underdogs like
Coventry and Wimbledon used to perform well above expectations, with both clubs
winning the FA Cup in the late 1980s. Wimbledon went from Non-League to FA Cup
winners in just 10 years, which would be a distant dream in today’s climate
where money can only buy you success.
Since Cristiano
Ronaldo went to Real Madrid for a then record of £80 million in 2009, 10
players have moved for over £50 million. Before 2009, Zidane was the record
transfer at £46 million. This proves how much money has influenced the game
more than ever, in the past 5 years.
Financial fair play (FFP) has since been
brought in just a couple of years ago. The plan here was to see a more even
playing field among clubs, to prevent clubs spending more than they earn
otherwise face penalties. Man City have already failed this last season and
were hit with small penalties by their standard. Their summer transfer budget
was reduced to under £50 million and they were hit with a £49 million fine.
This is not sufficient enough to change the game because this is a fine they
can easily pay off and £50 million is hardly a small amount of money.
Sports
lawyer Faye Bargery states that FFP has the potential to turn world football
into an even more uneven playing field. This is because he suggests smaller
clubs with restricted income will struggle to compete against the bigger clubs
as they can only spend what they make, which will pale in comparison to the
amount of money a Real Madrid makes. Also with FFP, the chances of a Roman Abramovich
pumping millions into a club are now very unlikely due to the money that will
be lost from over spending; only the clubs with the biggest revenue can hope of
competing at the very top. FFP will essentially create an oligopoly instead of
an even playing field, with football becoming increasingly dominated by a small
number of top clubs.
Until
something is done about clubs like Man Utd and Man City spending over £150 million
in a single transfer window as they have done in recent years, and a limit on player
wages then football will slowly die a painful death, lower down the ladder.
Clubs at the lower end of the scale will be killed off one by one by the uneven
distribution of money and the knowledge that they can never make it to the Promised
Land.
No comments:
Post a Comment